In 2019, Chase tweeted that I "use my ACLU credentials" to "legitimize my violent vision for trans death to be seen as a victim and the purveyor of some truth that exists behind the pages of [the ACLU's] advocacy for trans existence." Make of that what you will!
It’s always about ‘revolution’ (the fight to gain power). Use whomever and whatever, however necessary. She’s selected distressed children. And she will stand on a pile of their dead and mutilated bodies to get to the top.
From the same source, UK transwoman India Willoughby:
India: "The only difference between trans women and most cis women is having babies and periods. That’s it. In all other ways, we biologically and factually change sex."
Rather remarkably clueless that "having babies and periods" is the whole ballgame, that ovaries are the sine qua non to qualify as a human female. Which India won't EVER have.
🙂 Some Olympic-level rationalization and motivated "reasoning" from that rather benighted neck of the woods.
But, apropos of which, you might have some interest in this old tweet from evolutionary "biologist" Colin Wright -- his claim to that estate being rather tenuous -- on the topic:
Wright: "What if I woke up and my reproductive anatomy had somehow inexplicably changed from a functional penis and testes to a functional vagina and ovaries? Would I cease to be male? 100% YES! I would absolutely now be a female."
When Bruce Jenner and his ilk manage to replace their testicles with functional ovaries of their own is when I would agree they've changed sex. Won't be holding my breath ... 🙂
After her parents' divorce, her dad moved out and took the furniture: "Chase, who described his father last year as 'a die hard Fox News watching Trump voter,' is more distant."
Also when she was younger: "He cut off contact with his family and his high-school friends, did drugs, and struggled with an eating disorder."
The terrible father figure and eating disorder are indicative of being drawn to becoming the male role model she never had and hatred of her female body.
She has also said several times she doesn't really remember her childhood. It appears that nobody has asked her, but it would be helpful to inquire if she was sexually abused as a child because that is significant reason many women seek to "become" men or try to suppress memories.
Finally, she does not pass at all. She looks like a diminutive Jewish woman with a fade haircut because that is what she is (moustache and all).
She had a male role model and is modeling herself after him: He left her mother and Chase and the other children, and even took the furniture! Chase wants to be powerful, like her father. Chase does not care about how women are abused by men, and so is not concerned with men invading women's spaces and taking what should rightfully be for women and children.
If you did not know Chase was a woman larping as a man, from the video you might think Chase is a somewhat effeminate gay male. Although very slight of build even for such a male.
To whom you are attracted sexually is purely subjective and therefore cannot reasonably be contested by an outside observer.
Where you decide to live your life on a spectrum of superficial, stereotypical male to female attributes (and we all do) is also purely subjective and similarly cannot be questioned.
However, your biological sex reflects an objective reality which cannot be changed by your subjective personal view and futile attempts to do so can result in serious health impacts to you as well as harms to members of the sex you are impersonating (primarily women).
Others who are grounded in objective reality should never be forced to accept your subjective version of your actual biological sex.
Finally, it's past time for the LGB community to separate themselves from the trans activists who are trying to take away the rights of women to fairness in sports and to privacy and safety in their restrooms, locker rooms and prisons. They also advocate for the chemical and surgical mutilation of children many of whom would grow up gay.
Their actions are evil and the
understandable negative reaction to the harm they are causing is spilling over to innocent people who are just going about their business, marrying and leading their lives.
I'm confused. Why does breaking the binary and pretending sex is a spectrum and a series of characteristics rather than a binary choice - male or female - justify sterilizing and mutilating children and causing them to become less healthy, life-long medical patients?
I've never understood why this is the argument made by trans-activists: sex isn't real so we should be allowed to use society's medical resources for free in order to weaken our bodies so that they can look like the opposite sex - which apparently doesn't exist, and we must be able to do this to children before it's "too late!" It makes zero sense.
I can't make their argument make sense, but I can try to figure out where they're coming from:
If you deny children access to gender med, you're admitting gender med isn't a human right. If gender med isn't a human right, then "being trans" isn't a human right, even for adults. So child gender med must be defended.
All the "sex is a spectrum" stuff is just argumentation. What the masterminds really want is (1) to partake of gender med and (2) to be treated as someone they're not.
I'm with you. All I can come up with is, they know (on some level) that "gender-affirming care" doesn't do a damn thing to make a woman more like a man or a man more like a woman. So, they insist that sex is a spectrum, to try and make the people altered by this hokum not feel like it was all a complete waste.
This shit is the height of pseudoscience. I don’t care if people believe in astrology but I’d be damned if any interest group was trying desperately to codify the tenets of astrology into our legal system.
"The 2017 Endocrine Society guideline cited by the ACLU was drafted by a committee of less than a dozen people, all but one of whom were leaders in WPATH, and it was not reviewed beyond that group, according to Paul Hruz’s expert report in Skrmetti."
This illustrates why gender identity ideology and the policy and programs that implement its pernicious ideas are fundamentally illegitimate in a democratic society.
The comprehensive history of the trans capture of our institutions has yet to be written. Until then, it will be necessary to make reasonable inferences based on the circumstances. In the case of the Endocrine Society, it is reasonable to infer that trans activists and the trans allies with whom they collaborated intentionally took advantage of weaknesses in the society's governance practices. Those flaws permitted individuals with divided loyalties to stamp the society's imprimatur of approval on highly consequential and extremely contentious guidelines that by all rights should have been voted on by the entire membership.
It is difficult to believe that gender identity ideology would have spread as widely and as fast as it has if the elements of the trans agenda had been put to a vote of an informed and representative democratic decision-making body in every organization that ended up being captured.
Do we really need to listen to yet another traumatized Terf caught in expository doomscrolling make our opponents’ arguments for them over and over, again? And then obsessing over them like a shell-shocked soldier cowering in a bunker gibbering to themselves?
Know Thy Enemy is important, yes.
But.
To what painful level of detail do we really need to prove to ourselves that our enemy is crazy to the point of evil? Is it not enough to know that?
Because our response is the same regardless: “No. Men are not women and can never become them. You are confusing sex with “gender identity”, 2 very different things, and you can’t even define “gender identity”.
The US Federal Courts have said this repeatedly. A precedent has been created, with more to come.
“No. It is inherently harmful to base any attempt to heal a child or an adult on validating a lie.”
Spend minimal time to dismiss their deranged drivel as the deranged drivel it is, and focus on pushing OUR narrative.
I hear you, this is the tragedy of the times we are in that we are focused on bad ideas and not exploring ways to address the actual meaning crisis behind them.
But the work of this blog is vital in my view in teaching you how the real world works. This spells out the cascade of events that affects the real world very dramatically. I don't know the authors motivation but I assume she is aiming strategically at astute legal parties.
It is very relevant that there is no coherent legal view on what trans, sex or gender identity is, and that lawyers contradict their courtroom articulation of the truth admitting to just wanting to use arguments strategically as a means to blow the whole thing up.
Legal people are curious in that very few have come out against this nonsense, yet they tend to be quite smart people. Either it's that they're smart but stupid or they do actually see what's going on but are constrained. Seeing blogs like this would help people to see they're not alone.
It's interesting times we live in that fundamental challenges are occurring to our liberal system. Medical ethics discarded in favour of group think (medicine as transhumanism), lawyers creating binding new definitions of language outside of the democratic process and institutions abandoning any vestige of being politically neutral.
I am not sure what we all should do except work to our own local strengths and expertise.
"Strangio is putting on her magic show not for judges but for her client, the LGBTQ community. She dreams of winning a court order abolishing the binary because that will be the “magic moment” (step 5 of the illusion) when she can say to her comrades: look, all that silly handkerchief-waving about gender identity was a trick. I was fighting for a world without sex."
If Chase performs badly on 4 December and Skrmetti is upheld, will the ACLU abandon lex lobotomies for kids? Will; Chase be forced to get a real job? THIS IS SO EXCITING
Chase will get an easy ride from confused respectful justices, perform in mediocre fashion, and after the gender grift is thoroughly exposed and the ACLU falls apart she will be hired to a cushy law prof gig.
In 2019, Chase tweeted that I "use my ACLU credentials" to "legitimize my violent vision for trans death to be seen as a victim and the purveyor of some truth that exists behind the pages of [the ACLU's] advocacy for trans existence." Make of that what you will!
I have NO idea what that means and yet I think I get the gist. We are living through an extraordinary moment in American legal history.
It’s always about ‘revolution’ (the fight to gain power). Use whomever and whatever, however necessary. She’s selected distressed children. And she will stand on a pile of their dead and mutilated bodies to get to the top.
I see a glorification of and fascination with violence and death.
There is nothing these people won’t lie about.
Speaking of Chase and ICYMI, you might have some interest in these tweets of "his" which "he" has apparently since deleted:
Chase: "Girls who are trans are NOT males .... Just Stop. A girl has a female body. A girl is biologically female ..."
https://x.com/chasestrangio/status/1230827722282278914
https://x.com/chasestrangio/status/1349722419179622404
See here for the screenshots: https://speakingplainly.substack.com/p/is-it-really-true-that-no-ones-denying
From the same source, UK transwoman India Willoughby:
India: "The only difference between trans women and most cis women is having babies and periods. That’s it. In all other ways, we biologically and factually change sex."
https://x.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1558101840755056646
Rather remarkably clueless that "having babies and periods" is the whole ballgame, that ovaries are the sine qua non to qualify as a human female. Which India won't EVER have.
They'd probably rebrand their testes as trans ovaries and consider that a gotcha.
🙂 Some Olympic-level rationalization and motivated "reasoning" from that rather benighted neck of the woods.
But, apropos of which, you might have some interest in this old tweet from evolutionary "biologist" Colin Wright -- his claim to that estate being rather tenuous -- on the topic:
Wright: "What if I woke up and my reproductive anatomy had somehow inexplicably changed from a functional penis and testes to a functional vagina and ovaries? Would I cease to be male? 100% YES! I would absolutely now be a female."
https://x.com/SwipeWright/status/1240781010800979968
When Bruce Jenner and his ilk manage to replace their testicles with functional ovaries of their own is when I would agree they've changed sex. Won't be holding my breath ... 🙂
"Make of that what you will"
Haha, I've read it four times and I can't make heads nor tails of it. It looks like words chosen more or less at random.
From that New Yorker piece:
After her parents' divorce, her dad moved out and took the furniture: "Chase, who described his father last year as 'a die hard Fox News watching Trump voter,' is more distant."
Also when she was younger: "He cut off contact with his family and his high-school friends, did drugs, and struggled with an eating disorder."
The terrible father figure and eating disorder are indicative of being drawn to becoming the male role model she never had and hatred of her female body.
She has also said several times she doesn't really remember her childhood. It appears that nobody has asked her, but it would be helpful to inquire if she was sexually abused as a child because that is significant reason many women seek to "become" men or try to suppress memories.
Finally, she does not pass at all. She looks like a diminutive Jewish woman with a fade haircut because that is what she is (moustache and all).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujGLEYvC148
She had a male role model and is modeling herself after him: He left her mother and Chase and the other children, and even took the furniture! Chase wants to be powerful, like her father. Chase does not care about how women are abused by men, and so is not concerned with men invading women's spaces and taking what should rightfully be for women and children.
If you did not know Chase was a woman larping as a man, from the video you might think Chase is a somewhat effeminate gay male. Although very slight of build even for such a male.
I'm a masculine gay man and I've always thought that Chase Strangio might be the only woman in human history to have been born in a bitchy fag's body.
Glenna— first, it’s nice to put a name to the line drawing! Second: will you be our eyes and ears at the Court next month?🤞
I told you my name before, didn't I?!
I haven't decided if I'm going to DC. I might prefer to listen from home so I can blog right away.
That'll work! And yes, you told me, but it's nice to see you telling everyone now.
One of my peaking moments was seeing a Strangio tweet about how there is no such thing as a binary in sex, sex is a spectrum.
Up to that moment, naive me thought trans stuff was just about gender presentation, not sex. She woke me up!
To whom you are attracted sexually is purely subjective and therefore cannot reasonably be contested by an outside observer.
Where you decide to live your life on a spectrum of superficial, stereotypical male to female attributes (and we all do) is also purely subjective and similarly cannot be questioned.
However, your biological sex reflects an objective reality which cannot be changed by your subjective personal view and futile attempts to do so can result in serious health impacts to you as well as harms to members of the sex you are impersonating (primarily women).
Others who are grounded in objective reality should never be forced to accept your subjective version of your actual biological sex.
Finally, it's past time for the LGB community to separate themselves from the trans activists who are trying to take away the rights of women to fairness in sports and to privacy and safety in their restrooms, locker rooms and prisons. They also advocate for the chemical and surgical mutilation of children many of whom would grow up gay.
Their actions are evil and the
understandable negative reaction to the harm they are causing is spilling over to innocent people who are just going about their business, marrying and leading their lives.
I'm confused. Why does breaking the binary and pretending sex is a spectrum and a series of characteristics rather than a binary choice - male or female - justify sterilizing and mutilating children and causing them to become less healthy, life-long medical patients?
I've never understood why this is the argument made by trans-activists: sex isn't real so we should be allowed to use society's medical resources for free in order to weaken our bodies so that they can look like the opposite sex - which apparently doesn't exist, and we must be able to do this to children before it's "too late!" It makes zero sense.
I can't make their argument make sense, but I can try to figure out where they're coming from:
If you deny children access to gender med, you're admitting gender med isn't a human right. If gender med isn't a human right, then "being trans" isn't a human right, even for adults. So child gender med must be defended.
All the "sex is a spectrum" stuff is just argumentation. What the masterminds really want is (1) to partake of gender med and (2) to be treated as someone they're not.
I'm on Team Gender Affirming Care is Cosmetic Surgery (not life saving) and should be treated as such.
I'm with you. All I can come up with is, they know (on some level) that "gender-affirming care" doesn't do a damn thing to make a woman more like a man or a man more like a woman. So, they insist that sex is a spectrum, to try and make the people altered by this hokum not feel like it was all a complete waste.
This shit is the height of pseudoscience. I don’t care if people believe in astrology but I’d be damned if any interest group was trying desperately to codify the tenets of astrology into our legal system.
"The 2017 Endocrine Society guideline cited by the ACLU was drafted by a committee of less than a dozen people, all but one of whom were leaders in WPATH, and it was not reviewed beyond that group, according to Paul Hruz’s expert report in Skrmetti."
This illustrates why gender identity ideology and the policy and programs that implement its pernicious ideas are fundamentally illegitimate in a democratic society.
The comprehensive history of the trans capture of our institutions has yet to be written. Until then, it will be necessary to make reasonable inferences based on the circumstances. In the case of the Endocrine Society, it is reasonable to infer that trans activists and the trans allies with whom they collaborated intentionally took advantage of weaknesses in the society's governance practices. Those flaws permitted individuals with divided loyalties to stamp the society's imprimatur of approval on highly consequential and extremely contentious guidelines that by all rights should have been voted on by the entire membership.
It is difficult to believe that gender identity ideology would have spread as widely and as fast as it has if the elements of the trans agenda had been put to a vote of an informed and representative democratic decision-making body in every organization that ended up being captured.
Do we really need to listen to yet another traumatized Terf caught in expository doomscrolling make our opponents’ arguments for them over and over, again? And then obsessing over them like a shell-shocked soldier cowering in a bunker gibbering to themselves?
Know Thy Enemy is important, yes.
But.
To what painful level of detail do we really need to prove to ourselves that our enemy is crazy to the point of evil? Is it not enough to know that?
Because our response is the same regardless: “No. Men are not women and can never become them. You are confusing sex with “gender identity”, 2 very different things, and you can’t even define “gender identity”.
The US Federal Courts have said this repeatedly. A precedent has been created, with more to come.
“No. It is inherently harmful to base any attempt to heal a child or an adult on validating a lie.”
Spend minimal time to dismiss their deranged drivel as the deranged drivel it is, and focus on pushing OUR narrative.
I hear you, this is the tragedy of the times we are in that we are focused on bad ideas and not exploring ways to address the actual meaning crisis behind them.
But the work of this blog is vital in my view in teaching you how the real world works. This spells out the cascade of events that affects the real world very dramatically. I don't know the authors motivation but I assume she is aiming strategically at astute legal parties.
It is very relevant that there is no coherent legal view on what trans, sex or gender identity is, and that lawyers contradict their courtroom articulation of the truth admitting to just wanting to use arguments strategically as a means to blow the whole thing up.
Legal people are curious in that very few have come out against this nonsense, yet they tend to be quite smart people. Either it's that they're smart but stupid or they do actually see what's going on but are constrained. Seeing blogs like this would help people to see they're not alone.
It's interesting times we live in that fundamental challenges are occurring to our liberal system. Medical ethics discarded in favour of group think (medicine as transhumanism), lawyers creating binding new definitions of language outside of the democratic process and institutions abandoning any vestige of being politically neutral.
I am not sure what we all should do except work to our own local strengths and expertise.
This says it all:
"Strangio is putting on her magic show not for judges but for her client, the LGBTQ community. She dreams of winning a court order abolishing the binary because that will be the “magic moment” (step 5 of the illusion) when she can say to her comrades: look, all that silly handkerchief-waving about gender identity was a trick. I was fighting for a world without sex."
Is she going to appear before the justices with her hair looking like she's been blown through a hedge backwards as usual?
I have yet to read this, but I would be remiss if I didn't thank the author for referring to the ACLU's terror of a gay male lady lawyer as "she."
She's the reason I stopped believing in anything the ACLU said or supported.
Same here.
If Chase performs badly on 4 December and Skrmetti is upheld, will the ACLU abandon lex lobotomies for kids? Will; Chase be forced to get a real job? THIS IS SO EXCITING
Chase will get an easy ride from confused respectful justices, perform in mediocre fashion, and after the gender grift is thoroughly exposed and the ACLU falls apart she will be hired to a cushy law prof gig.
You might have some interest in my recent comment on Sasha Stone's new post:
"The Democrats Own the Trans Issue": https://sashastone.substack.com/p/the-democrats-own-the-trans-issue/comment/78156838
Particularly since you get "star billing" -- more or less. 🙂
"to make it more palatable to my readers I’ve replaced some nouns"
Well now I'm desperate to know what the original nouns were.